Search for: ""Garcetti v. Ceballos" OR "547 U.S. 410""
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006). [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:16 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), that the First Amendment does not protect public employee speech made pursuant to the plaintiff's official job duties. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), which rejected “the notion that the First Amendment shields from discipline the expressions employees make pursuant to their professional duties. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and 3. the damage caused by the speech to the efficiency of the government agency’s operation does not outweigh the value of the speech to the employee and the public (the so-called Pickering balance). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), which denied public employees protection when they speak out about a violation as part of their normal job duties. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 421, 126 S.Ct. 1951, 164 L.Ed.2d 689 (2006): "when public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, the employees are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006); Connick v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
Ceballos, the Supreme Court upheld the power of non-academic government employers to regulate their employees' speech that is pursuant to their employment duties. 547 U.S. 410, 421 (2006). [read post]
