Search for: ""Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc." OR "552 U.S. 312""
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
See White v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and – depending on the allegation – maybe implied preemption under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:54 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008): Lewkut v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:50 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312, 128 S.Ct. 999, 169 L.Ed.2d 892 (2008) the United States Supreme Court affirmed that the express pre-emption clause in the Medical Device Amendments (MDA) of 1976, 21 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).But the issue also comes up in Lanham Act cases involving litigation between commercial competitors. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and the manufacturers will either get out on preemption, e.g., Wolicki-Gables v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
Yesterday we received an email that started out like this:Thought you should be aware that a qui tam lawsuit against device maker, Medtronic was recently unsealed by the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:02 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).Not so fast.This amended complaint was essentially a regulatory "dump. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Medtronic, Inc., 451 F.3d 104, 125-26 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd on other grounds, 552 U.S. 312 (2008) (you know what). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:21 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
