Search for: "*du. S. v. White"
Results 61 - 80
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
ISIL has happily assumed the role of demon du jour, and therefore becomes relevant only as a stage piece, which is to say, as a symbol. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Also, the (wild) goose case ended for Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Québec v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Québec v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
McDonald’s Corp. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am
Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
Case citation: Munroe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided what might be its most important labor-and-employment decision of the current term—NLRB v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:21 am
Team A v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Agence du revenu du Québec, 2013 QCCS 5189 [1] Les demandeurs Le Groupe Enico inc. ( ci-après « Enico » ) et Jean-Yves Archambault ( ci-après « JYA » ) poursuivent les défendeurs l’Agence du revenu du Québec ( ci-après « RQ » )[1] et le Procureur général du Québec ( ci-après « PGQ » ) relativement… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:39 am
Once the story is stripped of its ramming the barricade myth, however, there is no justification under Tennessee v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 8:01 pm
do Cirque du Soleil em Las Vegas. 8. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:43 am
Great White Shark Enterprises, Inc.. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Lors d’un déjeuner-causerie organisé par l’Association du Barreau de l’Ontario, la juge Thorburn a examiné le commentaire de la Règle 1.03 du Code de déontologie des avocats qui prévoit que l’avocat doit, s’il y a lieu, informer son client de son droit à l’emploi du français dans le traitement de son dossier. . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
All of the State’s witnesses were white. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Pour n'être pas les esclaves martyrisés du temps, enivrez-vous sans cesse! [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:06 pm
CareFliteAccessing an Employee's Facebook Posts by "Shoulder Surfing" a Coworker's Page States Privacy Claim -- Ehling v. [read post]