Search for: "*fail v. Sears, Roebuck and Co" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Sears, Roebuck and Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
Sears Wins Dismissal of Class Action Over Kmart Merger The American Lawyer The plaintiffs in a long-running class action against Sears, Roebuck & Co. over its merger with Kmart had reason to be optimistic: Their case survived a motion to dismiss, and they won class certification. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am by malik11397
Because MERS was never served, it could not have failed to respond to that service and suffer a default judgment. [read post]
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-07-00758-CV, 270 SW3d 632, 08-21-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009) (breach of indenture agreement)09-0050JOHNNY RODRIGUEZ, JR. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]