Search for: "*u. S. v. Brake" Results 61 - 73 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Open micJanis Pilch, Rutgers U: domestically it seems obvious that litigation on 512 can’t change the systemic problem of infringement and the impossibility for most rightsholders to litigate. 512 sets up a permanent conflict b/t service providers and rightsholders. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:21 am by Peter J. Sluka
That’s the lesson that the plaintiff learned in Spiegler v Mish Mish Inc., where the Court’s resolution of the books and records demand put the brakes on the plaintiff’s claimed ownership altogether (22-CV-8774 [SD NY Oct 11, 2023] [report and recommendation adopted SD NY Nov 3, 2023]). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Unless there is some ambiguity in the language of a statute, a court's analysis must end with the statute's plain language . . . . [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Brake, 317 F.3d 1334, 1340 (Fed. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am by Michael Ehline
The result is the arrival of a new generation of vehicles that strives to meet the highest testing standards for braking and vehicle crashworthiness with moving and rigid barrier obstacles to help most vehicles avoid serious injury or death to occupants. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
  Amuchastegui's ending reference to Fidel Castro's famous "History Will Absolve Me" provides the proper level of irony to the 2023 assessment. [read post]