Search for: "*u.s. v. Humphrey"
Results 61 - 80
of 282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
Leveille, 2007 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
Leveille, 2007 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In Myers v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 11:34 am
In Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:35 pm
On Tuesday, the court heard en banc oral argument in Villegas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 11:15 am
Yellen, 594 U.S. 220 (2021), and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court case, Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), in which the U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:15 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926); Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 9:30 pm
" Humphrey, 482 F.3d at 847. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 4:55 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm
In its decision upholding the CFPB’s constitutionality, the Ninth Circuit relied substantially on the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 4:49 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
Hastie, later judge of the U.S, Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; Spottswood Robinson III, later chief judge of the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:39 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), that a Section 1983 lawsuit must be dismissed if its success would necessarily undercut the legitimacy of the plaintiff's criminal conviction, unless that conviction was reversed on appeal or called into question by a federal habeas corpus ruling. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:32 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), "Shapard’s version of the facts 'clearly impl[ies] the invalidity of his assault conviction, which has not been set aside, and consequently [his claims] arebarred by Heck[.] [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:09 am
This story led to an important 1967 Supreme Court decision—Time, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973), and Heck v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
Radford (invalidating provisions of the Frazier-Lemke Farm Mortgage Act), and Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
