Search for: "*u.s. v. One Parcel of Real Estate"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
Illinois (1892) 146 U.S. 387. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
& Power Co., 365 U.S. 624, 632 (1961)). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Scholastic Inc., 259 F3d at 86 [objective of the partnership was the "'development, packaging, production and distribution of theatrical feature films . . . while also involved . . . in television development and production'"]; Sanley Co. v Louis (197 AD2d 412, 413 [1st Dept 1993] [partnership's purpose was to acquire, manage and resell real estate]). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, LLP at (916) 456-9595. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
This case was not an action that fit within the provision of CCP §39 “[f]or the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property” or “[f]or the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
Najjar Group, LLC v West 56th Hotel LLC, recently decided by the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
The issue is one of pleading, not proof at trial. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, LLP at (916) 456-9595. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am
Three main arguments for Indian voting exclusion were Indian exemption from real estate taxes; maintenance of tribal affiliation; and the notion that Indians were under guardianship, or lived on lands controlled by federal trusteeship. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Bd.Court: U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
One very recent case that involves all three of these areas of eminent domain law is Hilliard v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
During a time of perhaps unprecedented partisanship in U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:02 pm
She wrote the majority opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Plunges nationwide in real estate values in cities like Detroit and Las Vegas attest to this fact. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Struggling Real Estate Developers May Get Power To Tax You Along the lines of the strange and perhaps outrageous, there’s an article in the Dallas Morning News reporting that the Dallas City Council is considering (today 2/11/09) giving real estate developers the power to tax Dallas-Fort Worth residents. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
His interview with one of them was telling. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
In Canada, as many know, we’ve had competition law since 1889 (one year as Canadians like to boast before the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:26 pm
Our analysis of the filings also confirms yet again that the likelihood of being tagged by the EEOC is not unlike the real estate market — it is all about location, location, location. [read post]
