Search for: ",In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B., Parent."
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm
A and B, as parent and natural guardian of C, filed the instant petition to compel an accounting against E, as co-executor of the estate of F and co-trustee of the testamentary trusts created under the will of F. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Michael B. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
She challenges ACS's reliance on the NYPD and medical reports, arguing that they were prepared in conjunction with her criminal investigation and not child protective matters. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
The second approach was the custody analysis, with each side calling into play such concepts as nurturing, emotional needs, happiness and, above all, best interests — concepts that are firmly rooted in child custody analyses. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
The court’s job is to make decisions about publication of information based upon a) legislation and court rules b) the welfare of the child and c) the competing human rights issues. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
The matter was placed before the Bench comprising J. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am
• There is no change to paragraph (b). [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
§ 1915(a)-(b). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
The question presented was whether the bypass provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(13), apply where the parents have never been offered family reunification services and neither parent was previously a subject of court-ordered treatment. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
Aditya Bandopadhyay, has examined the relevant provisions of the Right to Information Act while deciding a matter relating to the denial of right of right of inspection and re-evaluation of question papers by the Central Board of Secondary Education. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Neulinger caused a stir because the ECHR seemed to suggest that a fuller, welfare-based investigation might be appropriate in Article 13(b) cases, based on the need to respect the rights of the abducting parent and the child under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
Super. 234, 246-47 (J. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
(b) In all Indian child custody proceedings, as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, the court shall consider all of the findings contained in subdivision (a), strive to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families, comply with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, and seek to protect the best interest of the child. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
(b) In all Indian child custody proceedings, as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, the court shall consider all of the findings contained in subdivision (a), strive to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families, comply with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, and seek to protect the best interest of the child. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
A.B.C. in the matter of P.C., a minor, __ N.J. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
It might involve taking extra steps or precautions in the way that she performs her homemaking or parenting tasks. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Broadly: divorce, civil partnership and financial matters are not 'relevant family proceedings'. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
However, fairly obviously there are two criteria:• Domestic• Violence[4] In general terms, domestic violence occurs in a relationship of a domestic nature, typically husband and wife or de facto partners, whereas family violence occurs in a broader family relationship, eg parent to child.[5] The mistake that is often made is to fail to recognise abuse that is not physical, which can clearly be identified as domestic violence.[6] A useful definition, as good as any out… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
