Search for: ",In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents." Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
" We clarified that the "state's compelling interest to protect a child in any given case, however, is not triggered unless a court finds that a parent's speech is causing or will cause harm to a child's welfare. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:55 am
” The impossibility of perfect tailoring is especially apparent when the State’s compelling interest is as intangible as public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. b. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
Board of Education (1947), for example, we upheld against an Establishment Clause challenge a New Jersey law enabling a local school district to reimburse parents for the public transportation costs of sending their children to public and private schools, including parochial schools. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 5:16 am by David Bernstein
As a resource for teachers, parents, and students I am going to list the errors and egregious misinterpretations of history I found in the last 1/3 of the book. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.  A2190 Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA2228 Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
And when a doctor describes to expectant parents that it will be expensive and emotionally burdensome if they choose to have a child that genetic tests show may have a disability. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
The juvenile court was envisioned more as a surrogate parent than a prosecutor. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
An organization has “associational” standing to bring claims on behalf of its members if “(a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither [read post]