Search for: ". McCormick"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
McCormick of the Court of Chancery addressed an issue of first impression in Crispo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
Last week, John shared a blog from Tulane Law prof Ann Lipton flagging a recent transaction where the parties contemplated a charter amendment in the merger agreement to fix the Con Ed clause enforceability issues highlighted by Chancellor McCormick’s recent decision in Crispo v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In this case, Chancellor McCormick addresses an interesting question concerning the deal price primacy under Delaware law and ultimately rejects deference to it in controlling stockholder squeeze-out transactions subject to the MFW protections. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
Ann Lipton flagged a recent transaction that came up with a fix for the Con Ed clause enforceability issues highlighted by Chancellor McCormick’s recent decision in Crispo v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:48 am
For the immprof community, that was Elizabeth ("Besty") McCormick. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:37 pm
McCormick was also traveling south on Meadowbrook. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:39 am
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick over complaints that she may have violated campaign finance laws, failed to submit required disclosures and carried out improper hiring practices. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision addressing an important question that arises in mergers and acquisitions: if one of the parties (usually the buyer) refuses to close the transaction, can the jilted company (usually the target company) obtain “benefit-of-the-bargain” damages (including the lost premium that would have gone to stockholders)? [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision addressing an important question that arises in mergers and acquisitions: if one of the parties (usually the buyer) refuses to close the transaction, can the jilted company (usually the target company) obtain “benefit-of-the-bargain” damages (including the lost premium that would have gone to stockholders)? [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:56 am
The post McCormick’s 2050 net-zero emissions target validated by initiative appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
” McCormick v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Delaware’s trial of the century ended in a whisper as Chancellor McCormick dismissed the case. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
Having said that, however, I must note that Chancellor McCormick is not alarmed by recent developments suggesting that Caremark cases are becoming more frequent and easier to win. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm
The Annual General Meeting of the Irish Legal History Society on Friday, December 1, 2023, includes, at 6.45 GMT, the Winter Discourse, “The Trials of Bad Bridge,” by Elaine Farrell and Leanne McCormick. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Early this month, John blogged about Chancellor McCormick’s decision regarding a mootness fee petition in Crispo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
” 1 McCormick on Evid. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:25 am
McCORMICK v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:52 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:10 am
McCormick's 2022 bartending book Lawyerly Libations: Concoctions for the Counselor, Apéritifs for the Attorney, Elixirs for the Esquire, and Additional Alcoholic Anecdotes: A Cocktail Compilation for the Burgeoning Barrister's Bar (available in hardcover or paperback via Amazon). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
About this time last year, I blogged about Chancellor McCormick’s decision in Crispo v. [read post]
