Search for: "16 ACRES" Results 61 - 80 of 1,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2023, 6:34 am by Patricia Salkin
The Murdock Respondents own a 2.78-acre parcel located in the City of Blackfoot, Idaho (the “City”) zoned “Residential Ranchette”, which allows a homeowner to keep a specified number of domestic farm animals on the property so long as the property size is at least one acre of land. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 4:52 am by Charles Sartain
Barkley could buy back their residence and the 40-acre pasture across the road. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 October 2023, Steyn J will hear applications in the case of Donald Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence. [read post]
  In November 2018, Clovis again attempted to bring the Housing Element into compliance by adopting the RHN Overlay to provide by-right approval for multi-family housing at a density of 35 to 43 units per acre on any residentially zoned sites with a minimum of 1 acre and a maximum of 10 acres. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 12 September 2023, The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the United Kingdom (nos. 64371/16 and 64407/16). [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[16] Land or real property interests acquired by certain means—a foreign principal or Relevant Chinese Person may, on or after July 1, 2023, acquire land or real property that is subject to the restrictions set out above provided that such acquisition was by “devise or descent, through the enforcement of security interests, or through the collection of debts,” and provided that such foreign principal or [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De Siqueira and Elon Musk Ltd v… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 1:25 pm by Daily Record Staff
Part of a designated historic district, the property at 12-16 S. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, in a 2018 opinion that Justice Alito joined in full, the Court favorably cited McCardle as support for upholding an Act of Congress that obligated federal courts to dismiss lawsuits concerning a 147-acre parcel of land in Michigan.Given Congress’s very substantial power to alter the size and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court—which can have a decisive impact on what cases the Court hears and how it decides them—it would be anomalous if Congress had no power to… [read post]
This proposed ordinance would rezone over 23,000 acres of the City, impacting tens of thousands of homes without any environmental analysis and without legally adequate notice. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J heard an application to commit in the case of MBR Acres v Curtin. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Friday 16 June 2023 there was a pre-trial review the case of Zhurba v Person(s) Unknown before Nicklin J. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On 22 and 23 May 2023, the trial of MBR Acres Limited and others v FREE THE MBR BEAGLES QB-2021-003094 continued before Nicklin J. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
In 2020, the proposal was vetted by the federal interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which is comprised of representatives from 16 U.S. departments and agencies, including Treasury, Justice, Commerce, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:15 am by Irene
Officials told several local news outlets that Hernandez-Penal is also suspected of raping a 15-year-old girl on the same trail of the two-acre facility a week earlier. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
Named plaintiff Rikki Held (and the only one who was 18 years old when the suit was filed) lives with her family on a 7,000-acre ranch where they depend on water rights to a river that has dried up and land that’s been scorched by wildfires. [read post]