Search for: "A B C INSURANCE COMPANIES, 1-10" Results 61 - 80 of 1,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d §§ 4.05[2][a]-[c], 27.01[1][c]; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 10, § 10.01[4].] ■ Angela Dawson, Applicant v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
Smith might never get her website up and running, or that (b) same-sex couples would never actually request her services, or that (c) she would discourage—strongly—said couples, but not actually refuse them service. 1. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Philadelphia National Bank.[1] Today, I would like to discuss the enduring impact of this landmark case. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:00 am by Robert Liles
Health care providers participating in Medicare Advantage plans are increasingly dissatisfied when having to contest the denial of Part C claims. [read post]
” As laid out in Section  3729(b)(1), the FCA’s standard for scienter only allows liability when fraud occurs with actual knowledge; deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information, or; reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
The Chinese battery company Catl recently struck a deal worth more than $1 billion to develop Bolivia's lithium reserves. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 pm by Yale Hauptman
  When B died, by intestacy her share passed to her half brother, C. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
Permissive exclusion actions are covered in §1128(b)(1)–§1128(b)(16) and §1156 of the Social Security Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:38 am by Chip Merlin
Appraisers and Umpires shall not approach Appraisals in a manner prejudicial to the policyholder or insurance company. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[15] Material interference may be proven through several methods, such as: (i) inference from an entity’s intent to interfere, (ii) evidence that the “natural consequence” of the act or omission is interference, or (iii) evidence that the act or omission in fact interfered with a consumer’s understanding.[16] Furthermore, “it may be reasonable to presume” material interference if certain “consequential” transaction terms, such as pricing,… [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
" It then amends Section 25-11-121(10) ,Mississippi Code of 1972, to add the following: The board, in accordance with its fiduciary duties, shall make investment decisions with the sole purpose of maximizing the safety of, and return on, its investments. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We tolerate bad content b/c it is not sufficiently distinguishable from the good, valuable content. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 7:10 am by Ashley Morgan
Under this model, providers are responsible for (a) purchasing, (b) submission of claims, and (c) collections of co-insurance/co-payments. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 7:10 am by Ashley Morgan
Under this model, providers are responsible for (a) purchasing, (b) submission of claims, and (c) collections of co-insurance/co-payments. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The SEC proposed an array of new cybersecurity-related requirements in the form of: (1) an expansive new Rule 10, (2) extending the reach of Regulation SCI, and (3) expanding Regulation S-P, including to require incident response programs. [read post]