Search for: "A M v. Review Board" Results 61 - 80 of 2,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
At least while relations among the owners are copacetic, I’m sure I’d be met with incredulous looks if I were to recommend annual board elections and regular board meetings complete with meeting minutes to a small group of operating owners who are in regular if not daily contact with one another. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm by Dennis Crouch
A new amicus brief strongly supports the petition with an interesting historical review of obviousness doctrine from the past 150 years. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Skiadopoulos (Queen Mary University of London and the University of Piraeus), on Thursday, February 8, 2024 Tags: ESG, ESG alpha, SASB, Stock performance, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Global Proxy Voting Policy for Vanguard-advised funds Posted by John Galloway, Vanguard, Inc., on Thursday, February 8, 2024 Tags: Board composition, Board oversight, boards, executive pay, Proxy voting, Shareholder rights, Vanguard [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Skiadopoulos (Queen Mary University of London and the University of Piraeus), on Thursday, February 8, 2024 Tags: ESG, ESG alpha, SASB, Stock performance, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Global Proxy Voting Policy for Vanguard-advised funds Posted by John Galloway, Vanguard, Inc., on Thursday, February 8, 2024 Tags: Board composition, Board oversight, boards, executive pay, Proxy voting, Shareholder rights, Vanguard [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
” Similarly, “[m]ergers resulting in unconcentrated markets are unlikely to have adverse competitive effects and ordinarily require no further analysis. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by John Elwood
But the court denied review without recorded dissent to two-time relist Alaska v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
The Newbury Developmental Review Board denied a zoning permit for a proposed juvenile-detention facility with an exemption from conditional-use review under this statute as a “residential care home or group home” because it found that the proposed facility was more akin to a detention facility and would place the community at risk. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Moreover, a multi-year review of the Appeals Board’s decisions confirms that the Board generally addresses the underlying merits despite procedural defects that alone permit dismissal or denial. [read post]