Search for: "A. WALLACE TASHIMA" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Wallace Tashima (assigned to hear the case because the entire District of Hawaii bench recused itself), on standing and exhaustion/waiver grounds granted most of the motions for partial summary judgment filed by Defendants the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA), the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:49 am by Irene
Wallace Tashima, also said that “at some point in the future students may be able to make a stronger showing that irreparable harm is likely…. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:54 am by Jon Sands
Pelisamen, No. 10-10022 (4-13-11) (Tashima with W. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:46 am by Megan Lewis
Wallace Tashima issued a strongly worded concurrence that also included major disagreements with Reinhardt. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:26 am by SHG
Wallace Tashima’s opinion, sex was characterized as “the biological sex they were assigned at birth. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:56 am by Kent Scheidegger
Wallace Tashima dissents from the extraterritorial stay portion. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
Wallace Tashima on the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
Wallace Tashima, Marsha Berzon and Andrew Hurwitz held that the statute was unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the First Amendment because it criminalized a substantial amount of protected speech compared to its legitimate scope. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:46 am by James Kachmar
What happens when a junior trademark holder’s business becomes so popular and well known that it threatens to swamp the reputation of a senior mark holder? [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Wallace Tashima) read the complaint more generously as containing both a substantive component (the plaintiff’s inclusion on the No Fly List) and a procedural component (the sufficiency of the process to review that substantive decision for error). [read post]
31 May 2007, 10:47 am
The USDA's rule linked above, was upheld by the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion written by Clinton-appointed judge Wallace Tashima, and joined by Clinton appointee Richard Paez:Finally, the district court held that it was arbitrary and capricious for the agency not to require all Canadian cattle to be screened for BSE, because the screening test could identify some animals [read post]