Search for: "ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS COMPANY v. USA"
Results 61 - 80
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2010 WL 2640170, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 5:38 am
” [3] United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
But it is not only about them: the government estimates that 24,000 companies and organisations will be in scope. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
To support their positions, the companies often focused on the name or form of the product or transaction, not its substance. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
The judge uses some blunt language to point out the potential for prejudice to defendants in joining together all users at once in a “reverse class actin”The court agrees that technological advances have resulted in anonymous and stealthy tools for conducting copyright infringement on a large scale. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents Study published in Science magazine ‘Promoting Intellectual Discovery: Patents Versus Markets’ concludes free markets superior to patent monopolies (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) Economic woes impact valuations, but not all sectors are suffering (Technology Transfer Tactics) Cancer Institute study show impact of patent age on deal probability (Technology Transfer Tactics) Should management be involved in patenting decisions? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
The US Government has succeeded in its appeal against the decision not to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (USA v Julian Assange [2021] EWHC 3313 (Admin)). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Philip Morris USA (09-978); Altria Group v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
But through the magic of technology the “whole world is a stage” and actors turned politicians, and politicians turned actors are acutely aware that there is more power in the scene itself than in the triggering effect of signaling words and phrases (with apologies for the descent into the land of cliché). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
She discussed the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CALPERS: SECURITIES ACT STATUTE OF REPOSE NOT SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE TOLLING In California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:35 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by EPO):… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
He did, however, strike out the defendant’s Lucas-Box meanings on the ground that “advancing Lucas-Box meanings that are at variance with the actual meaning found by the Court is wrong in principle”. [read post]
