Search for: "AKINS v. PAGE" Results 61 - 80 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm by Anna Christensen
  To the case page for Milavetz, we have added an opinion recap by Stanford Law School’s Keisha Stanford, while the case page for Bloate now includes an opinion recap by Scott Street of Akin Gump. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:55 pm
Below, Akin Gump’s Scott Johnson previews NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
Below, Akin Gump's John Wittenzellner previews Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992), something akin to "strict scrutiny light"—and strike it down as an undue burden on the fundamental right to vote.In K., Farzana v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:18 pm by Anna Christensen
  To the case page for Abbott v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 7:05 pm
 This premise has been criticized by the Supreme Court in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, and, more recently by the Federal Circuit in Ultratec, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:38 am by Erin Miller
Below, Akin Gump’s Scott Street discusses last week’s opinion in Perdue v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:21 am
Below, Akin Gump's John Wittenzellner recaps Monday's oral argument in Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:50 pm by Anna Christensen
  To the case page for Dolan, we have also added an argument preview by Carl Cecere of Akin Gump. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:13 pm by Robert Laplaca
Short shrift (if any shrift) was given to the skill v. chance question. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:18 am
RM created `screen shots’ of what he saw on the Facebook page as well as what was in the messages section. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by Erin Miller
Lanning page on SCOTUSwiki for additional information about the case. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Danielle Citron
  Federal district court Judge Chen’s recent dismissal of the third amended complaint in Levitt v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Rockwell International v. [read post]