Search for: "ALEXANDER v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
Centennial Chair of Law at the University of Texas Law School and Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Liberty Under Law, An Interpretation of the Principles of Our Constitutional Government (1922) Robert Houghwout Jackson, Full Faith and Credit, the Lawyer’s Clause of the Constitution (1945) Hugo L. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Alexander Wohl dissects the case on the scotusblog. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” asked Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, a question that best illustrates how the concept was perceived at the time. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Commentary During the Ratification PeriodThe Federalist PapersThe Federalist No. 29 (Alexander Hamilton)The Federalist No. 46 (James Madison)Tench CoxeOther FederalistsD. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Unlike the District of Columbia, where you can be fined for showing people where the Constitution is (Todd Henderson, Truth on the Market), the blogosphere allows me to serve as your meagerly-paid tour guide to the best of the blawgs. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:56 pm by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the District of Columbia held that FDA acted unconstitutionally in Alliance for Natural Health, US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(ITC Law Blog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Florida on motions to stay pending re-examination: Fusilamp LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
– Laura Malone of Associated Press speaks at FTC conference on future of news (Ars Technica) Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rules FCC had no right to sanction Comcast for P2P blocking (Ars Technica) (EFF) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (IP Spotlight)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC rules AdWords doesn’t infringe bidding patent: Bid for Position, LLC v AOL, LLC et al (Ars Technica)   US Patents –… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The state Supreme Court called up the case for direct review, solely to decide the impact on state and local gun control laws of the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
We've been keeping an eye on some interesting litigation in the District of Columbia, Iacangelo v. [read post]