Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 61 - 80 of 94,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2024, 8:27 pm by Howard Friedman
As such, it does not prevent all men and women form worshiping Almighty God or not worshipping according to the dictates of their own consciences....Americans United issued a press release responding to the decision. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 5:18 pm by Gene Takagi
For purposes of this post, all references to grantmakers are to grantmakers that are recognized as tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and all references to grants are to grants made by such grantmakers. 1. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:21 am by Eric Goldman
(Note: currently in the US, ShutterStock has the legal freedom to ban all blackface photos, even photos with social or historical value. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:14 pm by David Klein
For this alleged misconduct, Plaintiffs, on behalf of all class members, asked that the Court award the $1,000 promised bonuses in actual damages, along with attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Fifth Circuit (unpublished): If things happened the way the plaintiffs say, that was obviously excessive force. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
It is an all-out brawl in federal court, with no-expense-spared battles over each and every picayune litigation issue. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am by Michael C. Dorf
After all, other things being equal, conservatives prefer a narrow view of standing to a broad one. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Maddy Carter
In a unanimous decision, the Court determined that the plaintiffs who opposed the FDA approval of the drug were not personally harmed by the FDA’s policies because none of the plaintiffs had ever prescribed or used the drug. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The 4-3 vote against the plaintiffs became a 5-2 vote in favor of them.The justices are still arguing about what due process means, as it is protected by the Louisiana Constitution.Chief Justice Weimer wrote the majority.Weimer’s majority opinion vacated the March ruling, concluding that the legislation constitutionally “revive[d] all causes of action related to sexual abuse of a minor that previously prescribed under any Louisiana prescriptive period. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:51 pm by Josh Blackman
The three individual plaintiffs, who, at the time the complaint was filed, were all residents of the city of Richmond or the adjacent Henrico County averred that they had been injured by the discriminatory acts of petitioners. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:02 pm by Patrick A. Salvi
We are prepared to handle all the legal work in your case and protect your rights while you heal and rest. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:17 pm by McNicholas
McGinnis was put on administrative leave “pending an investigation of alleged misconduct,” and ordered to stay away from all City Attorney facilities and not to contact colleagues. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
The rest of the relists are all returning for another week. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Eugene Volokh
But, no matter the approach taken, we all agree that the names clause does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 8:13 am by Kaitlin Schoberl
Rosenthal (Band 1)   LITIGATION: MAINLY PLAINTIFFS (Band 1) Steven C. [read post]