Search for: "AMAR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 6:17 am
The other major jurisdiction that specifically prohibits the destruction of art is India - a principle that was established by a seminal judicial precedent, Amar Nath Sehgal v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But, as Saul Cornell and Gerry Leonard have recently argued, America prior to the War never escaped the overall description of a “herrenvolk democracy. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
And luckily for America, there are no non-brazen routes by which the Republicans could keep Trump (and themselves) in power.To be sure, we all have seared in our memories the shamelessness of Bush v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
To switch gears from the First Amendment to Article One, a comparable switch may well occur when the subject turns to the constitutionality of Congressional-executive agreements that serve as the modern vehicle for committing America to international free-trade regimes. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Much of Masur’s book focuses on debates over state law and state-level civil rights reform efforts, whereas my collection focuses on federal law and national-level constitutional reform efforts. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
If you listened to the oral arguments in front the Supreme Court, and you thought that some of the questions being asked by the Justices displayed an inability to comprehend the basic functioning of health insurance in the United States, congratulations. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Indeed, Facebook allocates 87 percent of its misinformation budget to the United States and Canada alone. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Arthur Amaral, the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and Shawn Amaral, pled guilty to charges of failing to comply with asbestos disposal regulations (two counts) and were sentenced to serve two years of probation and to pay fines. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Arthur Amaral, 50, of Middleboro, the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and Shawn Amaral, 38, of Norton, pled guilty yesterday to charges of failing to comply with asbestos disposal regulations (two counts) and were sentenced to serve two years of probation and to pay fines. [read post]
