Search for: "AMAR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
After all, Article II provides that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” yet no one doubts that the President may transfer executive authority to his underling [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
To switch gears from the First Amendment to Article One, a comparable switch may well occur when the subject turns to the constitutionality of Congressional-executive agreements that serve as the modern vehicle for committing America to international free-trade regimes. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
And in the context of this diversity, the United States has not been striven by religious civil wars. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
By contrast, the work of a city council or board, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm
Professor Amar appears to accept the latter in his earlier book, America’s Constitution: A Biography (pg. 382), though he does not reach a definitive conclusion. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
If you listened to the oral arguments in front the Supreme Court, and you thought that some of the questions being asked by the Justices displayed an inability to comprehend the basic functioning of health insurance in the United States, congratulations. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:02 pm
United States, and of course, Plessy v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Holder, and HHS v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am
On Friday, the Senate approved a bill – crafted in response to the Court’s decision last Term in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm
Would the United States representative please come to the dais? [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Arthur Amaral, the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and Shawn Amaral, pled guilty to charges of failing to comply with asbestos disposal regulations (two counts) and were sentenced to serve two years of probation and to pay fines. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Arthur Amaral, 50, of Middleboro, the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and Shawn Amaral, 38, of Norton, pled guilty yesterday to charges of failing to comply with asbestos disposal regulations (two counts) and were sentenced to serve two years of probation and to pay fines. [read post]
