Search for: "ANDERSON v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
The move was announced by the Government as David Anderson QC delivered his Investigatory Powers Review to the Government. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
Delaware Chancery Court's Groundbreaking Decision: "Brokers" as Recordholders Here is some news from John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson: Last Tuesday, Delaware Vice Chancellor Laster delivered a potentially important opinion in Kurz v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
; Wherley v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
Guest speakers include: David Powers, Nancy Kim, Shirley Anderson and many other individuals. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:04 am
Anderson, COA23-821, ___ N.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Surveillance Privacy International submitted a written response to Lord David Anderson’s call for comments relating to his review of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether an Arizona commission violated the free speech rights of an anti-abortion organization by denying its application for a specialty “Choose Life” license plate. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Such funds are covered by the Securities Exchange Act (1934 Act) and are required to file disclosures with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), just like other publicly traded companies. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
By doing so, SOX specifically addresses conflicts that arise when one professional entity performs work for a client but also owes fiduciary duties to the investing public and company shareholders. [28] SOX intimidated KPMG into disbanding their global legal entity, KLegal, which employed mover than 3,000 lawyers in 60 countries. [29] However, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte & Touche, and Ernst & Young have no intentions of doing the same, despite added… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Furthermore, the many inconsistencies in commission decisions have made it impossible for the phrase to acquire a definite meaning in the process of regulation. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
This is what is keeping the Federal Communications Commission,[6] the Federal Trade Commission,[7] some in Congress,[8] and many media worrywarts up at night: the fear that, as traditional financing mechanisms falter (advertising, classifieds, subscription revenues, etc.), many traditional news-gathering efforts and institutions will disappear. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Further discussion of the desirability (or otherwise) of abolishing appeals to the Privy Council arose: in 1978 in the Report of the Royal Commission on the Courts; in 1989 in a Law Commission Paper on the Structure of the Courts; in 1995 in a report by the Solicitor General to the Cabinet Strategy Committee on court structures; in a Discussion Paper called “Reshaping New Zealand’s Appeal Structure” issued in 2000 by the Attorney General; and in an Advisory Group… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:21 am
In 1892’s landmark case, “Illinois Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:21 am
In 1892’s landmark case, “Illinois Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Lobbyists’ Revolving Door Leads Back to Capitol Hill Jobs Bloomberg Government – Megan Wilson | Published: 11/5/2019 More than 100 staff members traded in jobs with high-paying K Street firms, corporations, trade associations, or nonprofits for long hours on Capitol Hill beset by partisan brawls and legislative gridlock. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
