Search for: "ANDREWS v. GOOD"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Under the UCC, that inventory includes not only the goods the dealer owns, but also includes goods that are on consignment to the dealer.[4] The UCC therefore provides that where a consignor delivered goods to a dealer on consignment, and the dealer subsequently becomes bankrupt, the dealer’s creditors are entitled to sell goods that the dealer owns as well as goods on consignment with the dealer to cover any amounts remaining on outstanding debts. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:23 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Arkansas – Scrutiny of Arkansas Governor’s $19,000 Lectern Deepens After New Records Are Released Yahoo News – Andrew DeMillo (Associated Press) | Published: 10/10/2023 Arkansas Gov, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is facing new and deepening questions after ne [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 7:26 am
Michael Dorf and Andrew Koppelman. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 11:09 am
Andrew Fuller stated in his opinion that a review of the trial court’s ruling involves the construction of O.C.G.A. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
Art Law cases handled as an Assistant United States Attorney: United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
We believe that 10x Genomics has resorted to the courts and is misusing non-final court rulings as part of its commercial strategy to eliminate competition in the spatial transcriptomics market to the detriment of the public good. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
See, for example, Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Bray v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Gregory Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and Caitlin Gibson, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Monday, August 28, 2023 Editor's Note: Gregory V. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Gregory Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and Caitlin Gibson, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Monday, August 28, 2023 Editor's Note: Gregory V. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has cautioned… [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
First in Spokeo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
The writing is super approachable, so it’s a pretty good piece for students. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Andrew Free writes : " Data released in March by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)’s annual reporting requirements revealed a near-total systems failure inside the U.S. [read post]
