Search for: "Abbey v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
For those who don't live in or near London, Parliament Square Gardens (PSG) is the area of grass surrounded by statues and walkway which sits between the Houses of Parliament, Westminster Abbey and the new Supreme Court building. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
For those who don't live in or near London, Parliament Square Gardens (PSG) is the area of grass surrounded by statues and walkway which sits between the Houses of Parliament, Westminster Abbey and the new Supreme Court building. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Accordingly, the applicant will normally be required to pay the lessor's costs of the forfeiture proceedings, save in so far as those costs have been increased by the lessor's opposition to the grant of relief, upon appropriate terms - see Howard v Fanshawe [1895] 2 Ch 581, 592, and Abbey National Building Society v Maybeech Ltd and another [1985] Ch 190, 206. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Accordingly, the applicant will normally be required to pay the lessor's costs of the forfeiture proceedings, save in so far as those costs have been increased by the lessor's opposition to the grant of relief, upon appropriate terms - see Howard v Fanshawe [1895] 2 Ch 581, 592, and Abbey National Building Society v Maybeech Ltd and another [1985] Ch 190, 206. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
On Thursday 9th March 2023 the Court will hear R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 348. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
The two main questions in deciding whose interest had priority, and the questions to be considered by the Supreme Court, are: whether NEPB had been in a position, at the exchange of contracts, to confer equitable proprietary rights on Mrs Scott, as opposed to personal rights only; and if equitable rights were conferred, whether the decision of the House of Lords in Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1991] is to be applied. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm
In that case, Shapero v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
Dr Elithorn owned a house in London which was on the brink of repossession by the mortgagee, Abbey National. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:45 pm
In today’s case (Schuk v. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 5:59 am
Responses can be submitted by email (copyrightconsultation@ipo.gov.uk) or by post at the following address: Copyright Directorate Intellectual Property Office4 Abbey Orchard StreetLondon SW1P 2HT [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
Essays by Erwin Chemerinsky and Gerard V. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Per Lord Oliver in Abbey National BS v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Per Lord Oliver in Abbey National BS v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:56 am
The exceedingly long decision of the court in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm
Bruning v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Is copyright in a catatonic state? [read post]
