Search for: "Acuff v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am by Eric Goldman
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 580-81 (1994) (“Parody needs to mimic an original to make its point”). [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
  Instead, ´what is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer’ (following Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) and Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 113-14 (2d Cir 1998). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
Acuff-Rose, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), which held that an alleged rap parody of the popular song Pretty Woman could qualify as a parody protected by the copyright fair use doctrine. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Rachel Sandler
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 [4] CCA & B, LLC., v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
While the importance of this distinction under U.S. law diminished after the Supreme Court decision in the "Pretty Woman" case (Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.) in 1994 here, it still seems to occupy a more central role in the jurisprudence in other jurisdictions. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm by Ben
Even in the case of H3H3 v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
The case is TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd. v. [read post]