Search for: "Adams Express v. New York"
Results 61 - 80
of 403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 5:06 am
"Court Skeptical of Arizona Plan for Less-Partisan Congressional Redistricting": Adam Liptak has this article in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:14 am
The good news is that you may still register! [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:53 am
On Tuesday the Court issued opinions in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, the material-witness case, and Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 8:00 am
A district court in New York had granted summary judgment to the defendants on May 26, 2010. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
” Briefly: In the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Frank Garrison discuss Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
As Adam Liptak observes in The New York Times, the court’s docket presents “lower-profile but still consequential legal questions” that may allow the justices “to find ways to bridge the usual ideological divides” amid the continuing battle over the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the court. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
In a recent article, New York Times reporter Adam Liptak estimated that more than 2000 studies on this question have been published since the Supreme Court last addressed the issue in 1977. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 1:34 pm
On the wife’s motion for temporary relief, Supreme Court, New York County Justice Deborah A. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am
Adam Liptak at The New York Times covers the cert. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
The Justice told Adam Liptak of the New York Times that although “there are still pros and cons to be considered…. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports that the Court “appeared closely divided,” but he too notes that “[e]ven some justices who seemed sympathetic to the plaintiffs expressed qualms about how to administer [the] lawsuit” – an assessment echoed by Robert Barnes of the Washington Post. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Timbs v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:11 am
” In the New York Times, Adam Liptak links the “somewhat esoteric” Sorrell case to Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept… [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:51 pm
Adams, decided Friday by the Second Circuit (Judges John M. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[m]uch of the argument concerned whether paying the plaintiffs was practicable. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
” A non-lawyer partner of the disgraced Brett Socolow in TNG, a Title IX consulting business working for colleges to assure the conviction of males accused of sexual assault, Joseph Vincent, expressed a different view to the New York Times. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
The editorial board of the New York Times argues that the Court’s decision in Howes v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Russell, as Adam Liptak explains in the New York Times. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
by Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka, Progress Snaphot 6.1 Stephanie Clifford of the New York Times posted a very interesting article this week summarizing a recent “on-the-record chat” the Times staff had with Federal Trade Commission (FTC) chairman Jon Leibowitz and FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection chief David Vladeck. [read post]
