Search for: "Adams v. Jennings" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 10:30 am by Anna Salvatore
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of The Lawfare Podcast entitled “The ‘Disbarred’ Edition. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
  Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of The Lawfare Podcast. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Adam Segal discussed a new report on U.S. cyber policy from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and compared it to a report on the same topic nine years ago from CFR, both of which he was the project director for. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
  Bill Mears of CNN has coverage, as do MSNBC, Jen Chaney of the Washington Post, and Cameron Matthews of Spinner. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 am by Michael McCann
Sounds like an awesome experience to me.* * ** Last year I wrote a guest column on Torts Prof Blog on the tort implications of "game presentation" -- the various things stadium operators do to keep fans interested during games, including on-court and on-field promotions -- in the context of Coomer v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman offers relevant statistics about five front-runners. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Adam Schiff (D-CA)’s "good" draft for an ISIS AUMF. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Jen has an impressive repertoire of being a key component in cases of Nazi Era and Russian Revolution. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:12 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court’s per curiam order in Allaithi v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]