Search for: "Adoption of Shook" Results 61 - 80 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am by Sherry Colb
I asked whether we should have the letter and writer assessed as a possible threat, but the justice shook his head. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Sean McMeekin, Professor of History at Bard College, argues that the Russian Revolution(s) of 1917 are misunderstood in the West because we have been influenced by the many accounts (such as Ten Days That Shook the World by John Reed) that examine the upheaval using the concepts and the vocabulary of Marxist sociology and economics. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm by Al Saikali
  The company must also adopt reasonable security safeguards to protect the storage and transmission of biometric information. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm by Al Saikali
  The company must also adopt reasonable security safeguards to protect the storage and transmission of biometric information. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:43 am by Quinta Jurecic
When I got there, the person who has since been identified as a Russian attorney was talking about the issue of a ban on U.S. adoptions of Russian children. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:00 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The business character of the income of a partnership flows through to a partner, with the effect that a partner of a partnership with ECI treats its share of the income of the partnership as ECI (thus typically resulting in U.S. income taxation of that partner on its share of the partnership ECI.In 1991, the IRS put those principles into a bag, shook them up, and issued Rev.Rul. 91-32 which held that a partner with capital gain from the disposition of a partnership that is engaged in a… [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:04 pm by Al Saikali
When a breach occurs, companies often retain legal counsel to advise them on legal issues like whether the company adopted “reasonable” security safeguards; whether the company is obligated to notify affected customers and, if so, when and how; whether notice to regulators is required; and, what remedial measures are required. [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:04 pm by Al Saikali
When a breach occurs, companies often retain legal counsel to advise them on legal issues like whether the company adopted “reasonable” security safeguards; whether the company is obligated to notify affected customers and, if so, when and how; whether notice to regulators is required; and, what remedial measures are required. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
But at the end of the day, he tends to vote in favor of defendants and to adopt a narrow construction of civil rights statutes about as often as one would expect from a smart, quite conservative judge. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:09 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
The order went so far as to revoke visas and halt employer petitions for them, and that was really what shook employers last time, according to Elaine Young, a member of Kirton McConkie and contributor to Utah Employment Law Letter. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 12:18 pm by Kevin Crandall
Last week, we examined Judge Gorsuch’s decision in Shook v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 12:18 pm by Kevin Crandall
Last week, we examined Judge Gorsuch’s decision in Shook v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:32 am by Michael Geist
The declaratory order  was expressly adopted with Google in mind. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:32 am by Wystan Ackerman
Here is a summary of Judge Gorsuch’s class certification and CAFA opinions: Shook v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:00 pm by Al Saikali
Cal. 2012), at a time when other plaintiffs firms were pursuing data breach liability based on a failure to adopt reasonable security safeguards, they persuaded the court of a new theory:  that the gravamen was not the failure to adopt certain security safeguards, but the misrepresentations in consumer-facing statements about the safeguards that were actually in place. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:00 pm by Al Saikali
Cal. 2012), at a time when other plaintiffs firms were pursuing data breach liability based on a failure to adopt reasonable security safeguards, they persuaded the court of a new theory:  that the gravamen was not the failure to adopt certain security safeguards, but the misrepresentations in consumer-facing statements about the safeguards that were actually in place. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:37 pm by familoo
  I think that the Court had the benefit of the best experts around, arguing both sides, and all of the evidence, and making the finding that the LA had not proved that it was more likely than not that father shook the child was the only safe one to make. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm by Al Saikali
  DISCLAIMER:  The opinions expressed here represent those of Al Saikali and not those of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP or its clients. [read post]