Search for: "Adult Use Holdings Inc.." Results 61 - 80 of 585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Va. 2006)) or descriptive purposes (Sunmark, Inc. v Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., 64 F.3d 1055, 1060-61 (7th Cir. 1995)). [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 7:22 pm
Kelli Stokes is suing Pfizer Inc., McKesson Corporation, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and Schwartz Pharma for California products liability. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Donald died of mesothelioma in 2013, leaving behind two adult sons and his wife of 55 years.The jury found that Honeywell’s asbestos waste presented “a danger to persons using the products as intended. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
IMS Health Inc (23 June 2011) in which the Court voted 6-3 to strike down Vermont’s Prescription Confidentiality Law, which had prohibited the use, sale or disclosure of prescriber histories in pharmaceutical marketing to physicians. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
Bruen, SCOTUS holds that there is a constitutional right of law-abiding adults to carry firearms in public except in a limited category of "sensitive places" but that the Court also holds that neither this right nor the First Amendment protects a right of armed groups to assemble. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:26 am
DART Therapeutics Inc., a Massachusetts-based medical testing firm, is currently conducting research on a drug to be used for muscular dystrophy patients. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by Jared Staver
Adults have suffered a torn labrum, broken bones, abrasions, and bruising. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
PIONEER MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et. al, The Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act affords certain protections to elders and dependent adults. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm by INFORRM
  This legislation is unnecessary – since the 1992 case of Matusevitch v Telnikoff it has been clear that the US courts will not enforce foreign libel judgments where the local law does not apply US First Amendment standards. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The third decision, Law Society of B.C. v Canada Domain Name Exchange Corp., 2005 BCCA 535, involved a finding that confusion arose from the use of “lawsocietyofbc.ca” and “lsbc.org, even though the domain names led to an adult website clearly not affiliated with the law society. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
A jury awarded damages of US$231,000 in a decision which could have implications for the intemperate tone of US political advertising. [read post]