Search for: "Akers v. Akers"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27-28 April 2016. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27-28 April 2016. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27-28 April 2016. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27-28 April 2016. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27-28 April 2016. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
On Wednesday it will also hear the appeal of Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group regarding whether, as a matter of English private international law, equitable proprietary rights can be created in assets situated in a country where the lex situs does not recognise or permit the creation of such rights, in particular. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 4:00 pm
Akers (Senior Fiduciary Counsel, Bessemer Trust) recently published an article entitled, Estate of Holliday v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:45 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
Aker was sued in court over the remainder of the loan (USA v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Aker Plant Services Group, Inc.). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 pm
See Baskin v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 6:42 pm
See Baskin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
We've all heard that 'crime doesn't pay' but plaintiffs in Akers v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:21 am
Akers, Jr., James W. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
The freeholder, under, pressure from its mortgagees, served notice to quit on Aker, leaving Aker with no interest in the property save a licence to enforce the original possession order when it could. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:42 pm
The Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeals addressed an attempt to limit product brands in Akers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:45 am
The 6th Circuit, however, in Sharp v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
The plaintiff in Akers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
This was the pending US litigation at issue in the Aker v Neptune Quebec case. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:29 am
Reversing a lower court’s ruling that a 52-year old employee failed to show that he was laid off on account of his age, the Sixth Circuit found that his supervisor’s explanation about why the company retained a younger employee, in which he stated that he “had an opportunity to bring the next generation in, so that’s what we decided to do,” and that the company had a succession plan where “you bring in younger people, train them, so when the older people leave,… [read post]
