Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2016, 3:20 pm
NYT v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:12 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
At Akin, Pattie filed the respondent’s brief (available here) in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:52 pm
Below, Carl Cecere of Akin gump previews tomorrow’s oral argument in Dolan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:30 pm
Below, Carl Cecere of Akin Gump recaps last week’s oral argument in Dolan v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:07 pm
Below, Josh Friedman of Akin Gump recaps the Court’s opinion, handed down yesterday, in Abbott v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:44 pm
Holmstrom v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:22 pm
Who "the executive authority" is, is -- I would think -- a matter of state law, subject perhaps to some federal constraint on ridiculously arbitrary definitions (akin to the so-called Article II argument in Bush v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
As of this grant, Akin Gump represents the respondent in Hamilton v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:55 am
After all, we don't want to let the other side in on it… But here's what I can tell you: In what marked the first of several Supreme Court Moot Advocacy Courts of the year, Andy Rossman HLS '92, a partner at Akin Gump, stood in front of dozens of HLS students and rehearsed his defense of the constitutionality of the New York State convention system as questioned in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:34 pm
The American Constitution Society’s Indianapolis Chapter hosted a discussion of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Below, Georgetown 3L and 2008 Akin Gump summer associate Michael Bonsignore previews Locke v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:18 pm
Iskanian v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:33 am
Ultraflo Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:22 am
Thanks to the Supreme Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:19 am
But maybe that's because at issue was something akin to state law (Guam), maybe because the issue arose under the Guam Rules of Criminal Procedure (which are, admittedly, akin to the Federal Rules), or maybe just because the prior panel was confused.But today's panel essentially says: Whatever. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm
Below, Scott Street of Akin Gump recaps the opinion handed down yesterday in Bloate v. [read post]
