Search for: "Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
The court threw new obstacles Friday in front of the Sevier Power Co. by requiring a substantial updating of its air-pollution permit for a 270-megawatt, $600 million electric generator in Sigurd. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
  As we previously reported, earlier this year the DOJ obtained the first-ever federal jury conviction under the Economic Espionage Act in the U.S. v. [read post]
  Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The libel claim in Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm has been heard in the Federal Court. [read post]
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
Click Here Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs Colorado Bumper Exchange Site, Pueblo, Pueblo County, CO. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
It is unbecoming for elected officials to avoid their constitutional obligation (see New York Constitution, Article 6, sec. 25), to a co-equal branch of government for petty and personal reasons. [read post]