Search for: "Alaska Juris, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm by Christa Culver
., are subject to arbitration pursuant to a valid arbitration agreement.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Petitioners' replyAmicus brief of DRI - the Voice of the Defense BarAmicus brief of Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by John Elwood
But the court denied review without recorded dissent to two-time relist Alaska v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Hillhaven West, Inc., 776 P.2d 488, 503 (Mont. 1989) (“no vested right to exemplary damages”); Fust v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Hillhaven West, Inc., 776 P.2d 488, 503 (Mont. 1989) (“no vested right to exemplary damages”); Fust v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
In both negligence and strict liability, a successful cause of action requires either breach of duty (negligence) or product defect (strict liability) before the case can get to the jury. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., 257 P.3d 1130, 1137-38 (2011) (emphasis original). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
Alaska June 14, 2010) (firearm). [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:41 am by John McFarland
Whole books have been written about these implied covenants, the most recent of which is an excellent book by John Burritt McArthur, “Oil and Gas Implied Covenants for the 21st Century” (Juris Publishing, Inc. 2014). [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
High Court The Recorder High-tech lawyers and their clients were relieved in February 2005 when the California Supreme Court took up a controversial case in which Genentech Inc. had been hit with a $500 million jury verdict -- $200 million of it in punitive damages. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
A jury awarded the terminated shareholder (Kevin) over $5 million based on the valuation calculated by his expert appraiser. [read post]