Search for: "Alls v. Dept. of Revenue"
Results 61 - 80
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Moyal, 85 A.D.3d 614, 615, 927 N.Y.S.2d 19, 22 (1st Dept. 2011); Frey v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
Washington Dept. of Revenue – No chance for a grant here, either. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 1:29 pm
of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
The Court pointed out that in True v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
Davis v Kentucky Dept of revenue involves the right of states to provide tax exemptions only for their own bonds, discriminating against bonds issued by other states. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
State of Florida, Dept. of Revenue received a great deal of attention in commercial real estate circles in Florida. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 2:55 am
Missouri Dept. of Revenue (St Louis County - 10/25/2007), which was a trial judgment in Favor of DWI defendant in 1 year revocation hearing, ordering the Missouri DOR to dismiss all administrative action against his license. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:47 am
Dept of Revenue, the State of Illinois. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:18 pm
State, Dept. of Revenue, 159 Wash. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
Yesterday I attended the Coral Gables Forum candidates’ debate for Coral Gables Commission Group V election. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 5:57 am
OF REVENUE v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:56 am
Wyoming Dept. of Revenue, 329 P.3d 131 (Wyo. 2014); City of Chicago v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
Illinois Dept. of Revenue (06-1413) (tax on sale of investment in LexisNexis): docket, petition, brief in opposition, reply. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
The LLC movement stalled until 1988 when the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 88-76 recognizing pass-through partnership tax classification for the Wyoming LLC. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Alabama Dept. of Revenue, No. 09-520. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
Plaintiffs failed to show that the NTP defendants actively projected themselves into New York to engage in a sustained and substantial transaction of business within New York, thereby purposefully availing themselves of the privilege of conducting activities in New York so as to subject them to long-arm jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1) (see Paterno v Laser Spine Inst., 24 NY3d 370 [2014]; Bloomgarden v Lanza, 143 AD3d 850 [2d Dept. 2016]). [read post]
