Search for: "Alvarez v. People of California" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
  The first was Freeman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
A.D. 2002) (Bexis’ case); Alvarez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Alvarez, an elected member of the board of directors of a water district in Southern California, described his background at a public meeting in 2007. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Alvarez, an elected member of the board of directors of a water district in Southern California, described his background at a public meeting in 2007. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
“The point of copyright protection is to encourage people to create things that will ultimately belong to the public. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm by Mark Murakami
  Per the Ninth Circuit: Apparently, Alvarez makes a hobby of lying about himself to make people think he is “a psycho from the mental ward with Rambo stories. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:32 am by Mike Scarcella
Stolen Valor: The prosecution of Xavier Alvarez, a California resident who was charged with lying about being a military hero, is likely to make its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Davis, 320 F.3d 1014, 1015 n.** (9th Cir. 2003); Alvarez-Machain v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:31 pm by Jon Sands
The factors to consider are set out in People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Garcia-Alvarez, No. 071471, 071697 Conviction for carjacking and firearms offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence proffered against defendant was not sufficient; and 2) the district court erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. [read post]