Search for: "Amendments To The Florida Rules of Traffic Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 10:25 am
In ruling on Suing’s motion to suppress, the district court judge first found that the “traffic stop was legal”: A traffic stop amounts to a seizure for 4th Amendment purposes. . . . [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
Landry based upon the reliance of the court's ruling in State s. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
Florida courts have ruled twice -- once after a Supreme Court remand in this case -- that such a dog sniff search outside a residence violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:41 am
In 1983, the Supreme Court ruled that the use of dogs did not constitute a search. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled on two drug dog cases in the last few weeks: Florida v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:13 am
That doesn’t make it a good idea, and as the appellate court ruled, it may violate The Golden Rule. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
The Court held that whenever police have probable cause that a motorist has violated a traffic law, a stop is constitutionally reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:11 am
This is rooted in our Constitution, and specifically, Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution, the 4th Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:03 pm
Drug Offense Defenses Every case is fact-specific, and prior court decisions will always affect how your defense is structured. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:35 am
Supreme Court case, Florida v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 12:33 pm
Justice Roberts expressed doubt that a DWI case would fall under the general rule expressed by Florida v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:43 pm
Then, in Florida v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:18 am
Nino ain’t buying: Today’s opinion does not explicitly adopt such a departure from our normal Fourth Amendment requirement that anonymous tips must be corroborated; it purports to adhere to our prior cases, such as Florida v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in the 1986 case of Cannon v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:25 pm
A Florida Court has just ruled there was reasonable suspicion to justify a pat down where there was a traffic stop, the target appeared nervous, could not answer some of the officer's questions, had made a sudden U-turn into an oncoming traffic lane, and then parked facing the wrong direction just prior to the stop. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
Justice Samuel Alito Jr., the sole dissenter, argued that the police officer’s action in this case was “entirely reasonable,” while it was the court’s ruling that was not. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:17 am
The appeals court ruled that the damage award was excessive. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
So far it sounds like a pretty routine Fourth Amendment traffic stop case. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
Justice Samuel Alito Jr., the sole dissenter, argued that the police officer’s action in this case was “entirely reasonable,” while it was the court’s ruling that was not. [read post]
