Search for: "American Federation v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGE."
Results 61 - 80
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
Office of Personnel Management, 699 F. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
The launch will include a panel featuring co-authors Joseph Bahout, Marwan Muasher, Maha Yahya, and contributor Rima Karami-Akkary of the American University in Beirut. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
Office of Personnel Management" [citing a declaration by one of plaintiffs' experts]. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
Office of Personnel Management, that the Federal Defense of Marriage Act 11 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 7:21 am
” Speaking of Chinese hacks, Paul Rosenzweig asked the Office of Personnel Management, “where’s my letter? [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 3:02 pm
In Watts v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
.: The Center for a New American Security will host an event entitled A Realistic Path for Progress on Iran, marking the release of its report, “A Realistic Path for Progress on Iran: 12 Guiding Principles to Achieve U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
In Bryant v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm
Patent and Trademark Office in 2017. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”Some 35 years later, in Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
An extensive complaint seeking federal prosecution of American officials who ordered, authorized, approved or committed war crimes is currently being prepared. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Office of Personnel Management ................................. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
Id., See Office of Personnel Management v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
His impact as a LGBTQ rights pioneer was acknowledged in a statement by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director John Berry in 2011. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:56 pm
Office of Personnel Management (N.D. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Nevils 13-1305Issue: Whether the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act (FEHBA), which governs the federal government’s provision of health benefits to millions of federal employees and their dependents, preempts state laws precluding carriers that administer FEHBA plans from seeking subrogation as required by their contracts with the Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s ruling last week in Carr v Global Payments Inc. [read post]
