Search for: "Andersen v. Edwards"
Results 61 - 80
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 6:15 am
The case, called Edwards v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held in Comedy Club, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
In its analysis of Section 16600, the Court focused on the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:46 pm
Weideman Following the lead of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Edwards v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP Watchdog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (IAM) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Baristas) (PatentBIOtech) (Patent Docs) USPTO news: E-Commerce alert – tips to improve your e-filing effectiveness (Patent Docs) IP protection in the US fashion industry (IP Osgoode) (IP Osgoode) US General – Decisions California Supreme Court reaffirms strong public policy against covenants not to compete:… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:45 am
Andersen pointed out that a federal court in International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:09 pm
Arthur Andersen (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, 946 . . .? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:45 am
In Raymond Edwards II vs. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:25 am
It is important to note that in California, it is extremely difficult for employers to enforce non-competition agreements due to a California Supreme Court ruling in Edwards v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
By Robert Milligan and Nicholas Waddles The California Supreme Court's decision in Edwards v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:41 pm
’” (citations omitted) The court also rejected Plaintiffs’ argument that the newly decided case of Edwards v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 6:59 am
The court’s decision highlights what the California Supreme Court made clear in its Edwards v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 5:37 am
Arthur Andersen: The California Supreme Court's recent decision in Edwards v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
[Cross-reference to Lemley and Pooley, California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards discussing Edwards v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:46 pm
Here is the abstract:In Edwards v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
" Edwards v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 7:39 pm
Citing the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Edwards v. [read post]
