Search for: "Anderson, Appeal of" Results 61 - 80 of 2,655
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
Anderson overwhelmingly focused on the issue of whether Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is "self-executing," that is whether states can enforce it in the absence of congressional legislation. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Attending Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Eight: The First Amendment/Right to Vote/Federalism-Based "Off-Ramp" Argument that is Likely to Carry the Day
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
, Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
US Supreme Court hears arguments over Colorado decision disqualifying Trump from state primary ballot — developing story
8 Feb 2024, 8:12 am by Lauren Ban &#124; U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
Anderson will determine whether states are entitled to remove current Republican frontrunner Trump from election ballots over his actions on January 6, 2021, when the US Capitol was stormed by protesters. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
The morning read for Thursday, Feb. 8
8 Feb 2024, 6:27 am by Ellena Erskine
Anderson. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Amicus Brief, Michigan Court of Appeals (12/6/23). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Programming note
7 Feb 2024, 6:55 pm by Howard Bashman
Anderson, No. 23-719. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
The U.S. is no Longer a "Mature Democracy": Implications for Trump's Ballot Eligibility
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Anderson as a basis for leaving the case to the political process. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
“The 91-year-old Republican suing to kick Donald Trump off the ballot; Norma Anderson, a trailblazing former GOP legislator, is among the Colorado voters who have challenged the Republican front-runner’s candidacy in a case that will be heard by the Supreme Court”
5 Feb 2024, 10:29 am by Howard Bashman
The post “The 91-year-old Republican suing to kick Donald Trump off the ballot; Norma Anderson, a trailblazing former GOP legislator, is among the Colorado voters who have challenged the Republican front-runner’s candidacy in a case that will be heard by the Supreme Court” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
The Colorado Supreme Court, however, stayed its decision until Jan. 4, 2024, pending an appeal to the U.S. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
Anderson asserts (pp. 38-40) that Section Three can only be enforced following a criminal conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm by Howard Bashman
Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Supreme Court were to settle upon and announce a definition in this case—particularly one as broad and open-ended as that in Noah Webster’s 1857 American Dictionary of the English Language (which included “the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law”)—such a ruling could have unanticipated downstream ramifications for other cases that are materially different from this one, and implications for statutes that use the… [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Untitled
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Anderson” is based on a serious mistake. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Colorado voters in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] What If Trump v. Anderson Is Treated Like an Election Law Case?
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
(Anderson-Burdick anyone?) [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/