Search for: "Anderson v. UPS" Results 61 - 80 of 1,463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson: Collected Posts
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by Marty Lederman
Anderson. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Attending Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
"Thursday’s case arose from a December ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court disqualifying Mr. Trump from the state’s Republican primary ballot..."
8 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Anderson — that is up for oral argument in the Supreme Court this morning.You can listen in real time at the Court's website, here. [read post]
Althouse - https://althouse.blogspot.com
:@WilliamBaude: The Facts Matter, Trials Matter, The Record Matters
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
In Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
Term Limits v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
Today we take up some problems with Lash's use of constitutional legislative history, even where accurately recounted, in the course of legal analysis of the Constitution's text. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
To read such a requirement into Section Three is to make up something that is not there. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Untitled
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  Even though only nine years had elapsed, however, the Supreme Court took up Smith v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection That Enforcing Section Three Would Be Too "Dangerous"
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
  The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] What If Trump v. Anderson Is Treated Like an Election Law Case?
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
(Anderson-Burdick anyone?) [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
WIPIP session 2: ™ Doctrine, © Fair Use
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Hanover Star v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/