Search for: "Andrew Longstreth"
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Writing at the Reuters News & Insight blog, Andrew Longstreth covers Wednesday’s oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:32 pm
The Am Law Litigation Daily's Andrew Longstreth has learned that Steptoe & Johnson litigation partner Michael Miller, a former prosecutor familiar with Ponzi-style schemes, is representing a New York-based investor group. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:10 am
Andrew Longstreth’s August 20, 2010 Am Law Litigation Daily article about the decision can be found here. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Andrew Longstreth of Reuters (via the Chicago Tribune) writes that last Term’s Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:02 am
Suit Against Rating Agencies Dismissed, But Without Reaching First Amendment Issues: According to a January 27, 2010 Am Law Litigation Daily article by Andrew Longstreth (here), Judge Lewis Kaplan has granted the motions of Moody's and S&P to be dismissed from a securities lawsuit filed by certain investors who had invested in certain mortgage-backed securities underrwitten by Lehman Brothers. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:16 pm
“ Andrew Longstreth of AmLaw Daily has a May 7, 2009 article about the Household verdict, here. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
According to Andrew Longstreth’s September 16, 2010 article in the Am Law Litigation Daily (here), Judge Marrero’s order in the Alstom case "appears to be the first decision to address the various plaintiffs’ "controversial interpretation" of Morrison. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:51 am
The Vivendi trial is unusual in another respect – it involves the claims of so-called "f-cubed" claimants, as detailed in an October 5, 2009 AmLaw Litigation Daily article by Andrew Longstreth (here). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:26 am
The parties are anxiously awaiting the verdict and in the meantime debating what the length of the jury deliberations may mean, according to a January 26, 2010 article by Andrew Longstreth on AmLaw Litigation Daily (here). [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:50 am
” Andrew Longstreth's June 1, 2010 Am Law Litigation Daily article discussing this aspect of Judge Rakoff's opinion can be found here. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:29 am
As Andrew Longstreth reported on July 27, 2010 in the Am Law Litigation Daily (here), the parties to the Vivendi case recently presented their arguments to the court on the impact of Morrison. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:32 am
Andrew Longstreth’s September 27 Am Law Litigation Daily article about the decision can be found here. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:09 am
Andrew Longstreth's August 26, 2009 article in the American Lawyer about the settlement can be found here. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:31 am
Andrew Longstreth’s April 27, 2010 Am Law Litigation Daily article about the decision can be found here. . ?? [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Government Watchdog Says White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows Spent Campaign Funds on Personal Expenditures Business Insider – Yelena Dzhanova | Published: 10/31/2020 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is calling for an investigation into White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows after accusing him of misusing thousands of dollars in campaign funds. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
Andrew Longstreth's July 15, 2010 Am Law Litigation Daily article with his thoughts about the effect of the Goldman SEC settlement on other litigation pending against Goldman can be found here. [read post]
19 May 2009, 3:09 am
Andrew Longstreth’s May 18, 2009 Law.com article regaring the WaMu decision can be found here. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:37 am
UPDATE: Andrew Longstreth's July 16, 2009 American Lawyer article about this settlement (here) includes a statement from counsel for one of the outside directrros that insurers did contribute toward the outside directors' settlement and the outside directors are pursuing payments from excess insurers. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
And to add insult to (financial) injury, Judge Koblitz got super-snarky in the opinion setting forth her reasoning….As first reported by Andrew Longstreth in the American Lawyer, last Friday Judge Koblitz issued her final opinion (PDF), “rejecting the firms’ arguments for mercy and ordering them to pay $1.96 million in legal fees to the defendants, Perelman’s former father-in-law and brother-in-law. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
Andrew Longstreth's March 18, 2010 AmLaw Litigation Daily article about the CIBC decision can be found here. [read post]
