Search for: "Andrew v. Stephens"
Results 61 - 80
of 588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 1:04 pm
” Lawson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Edited by Andrew LongstrethEdited by Andrew Longstreth SECURITIES Lamb Again? [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
BiographyKF8745.B68 S74 2010Justice Brennan : liberal champion / Seth Stern and Stephen Wermiel.Stern, Seth (Seth Ross), 1975-Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010.BiographyE332.2 .B864 2010Madison and Jefferson / Andrew Burstein and Nancy Isenberg.Burstein, Andrew.New York : Random House, c2010BiographyHB3717 1929 .P47 2010The hellhound of Wall Street : how Ferdinand Pecora's investigation of the Great Crash forever changed American finance / Michael Perino.Perino, Michael… [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
After the war, Stephens was imprisoned, but was granted a pardon by President Andrew Johnson and was elected to the House of Representatives to serve in the 43rd Congress (1873-1875). [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:40 pm
When the employee insisted on wearing skirt-suits, as part of the process of transitioning from male (Andrew Stephens) to female (Amiee Australia Stephens), the employer dismissed the employee; the EEOC claims that this was sex discrimination. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
Even in the Florida 2000 election case of Bush v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
North Carolina] Interesting: arguments that might work for progressive litigation outcomes in a more conservative Supreme Court [Daniel Hemel, Take Care] Notable cert grants: continued viability of Illinois Brick indirect purchaser doctrine [Cory Andrews, WLF on Apple v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm
Justin Neighbors, No. 105,588 (Lyon)State appeal (petition for review)Stephen J. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:02 pm
Kunin and Andrew K. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm
In particular, Stephen Pitel has argued on this very blog that jurisdiction clauses should be assessed on the balance of probabilities, as opposed to the “good arguable case” standard that is commonly applied (see, in more detail, Stephen Pitel and Jonathan de Vries “The Standard of Proof for Jurisdiction Clauses” (2008) 46 Canadian Business Law Journal 66). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
With everybody debating big picture issues like corporate purpose & stakeholder v. shareholder interests, this “Ethical Boardroom” article by Harvard’s Stephen Davis is a reminder that when it comes to good governance, there are more fundamental issues that need to be addressed – like making sure directors have the information they need to do their jobs. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Husted v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Andrew Kahrl (University of Virginia) weighs in here, at the New York Times. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Here are links to important resources and commentary on the state of indigent defense at Gideon's golden anniversary: ACLU: "Too Many Still Wait to Hear Gideon's Trumpet" Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: "'Gideon v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:21 pm
Hausman (argued) and Andrew J. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:12 am
., Andrew Davis, Andrew N. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am
In analysis for The Daily Beast, Andrew Cohen argues that “does not represent a constitutional crisis. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
About two-thirds into the opening argument in Jennings v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:34 am
Justice Stephen Breyer is in the news as he promotes his new book on U.S. courts and foreign law. [read post]
