Search for: "Andrews v. Peters" Results 61 - 80 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A dissenting judge argued that one of the patents contained plausibly valid claims that recited technical improvements to a graphical user interface (International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by Claire Phipps-Jones (Bristows)
Applying the approach to urgency adopted in 10x v Curio, the Hamburg Local Division determined that the application lacked urgency. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:30 am by James Boon (Bristows)
On 12 July 2024 the English Court of Appeal gave its second FRAND determination judgment, in the context of an appeal and cross-appeal of Mellor J’s first instance decision in IDC v Lenovo. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Varella] and delegation of arbitrability [Peter Phillips on Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Optis Cellular Technology LLC v Apple Retail UK Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 552, handed down on 1 May 2025, is arguably the most significant UK FRAND decision since Unwired Planet v Huawei. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
For the reasons that follow, we find no error and therefore affirm the district court's judgment. 08a0371p.06 2008/10/10 Andrews v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Matt Kaiser, Above the Law; Peter Henning, N.Y. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:25 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Hoffmann Eitle)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational Data… [read post]
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2024 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court, Second Edition by Pieter Callens & Sam Granata€ 176 Artificial Intelligence and… [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 3:50 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Hoffmann Eitle)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational Data… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
New York Blawger Andrew Lavoot Bluestone, who writes the New York Attorney Malpractice Blog, was found liable last week by the First Department for impermissible advertising prohibited by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (47 USC § 227) (Stern v Bluestone, 2008 NY Slip Op 00611). [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
 The jury were unable to agree on two charges (against Andrew Coulson and Clive Goodman). [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Bainbridge, more, Peter Van Doren/Cato] Will Court agree to revisit Alien Tort Statute in Ivory Coast-related case of Nestle v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
Writing for the DealBook blog of the New York Times, Andrew Pincus revisits the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:29 pm by Taryn Rucinski
Energy, utility, transportation and environmental law for the 21st century : a collection / Peter V. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:00 am by Francion Brooks (Bristows)
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]