Search for: "Andrews v. Unknown" Results 61 - 80 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2009, 10:40 am by Ian Ayres
But what is still unknown is whether prediction markets dominate statistical prediction. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:26 am
Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone, Mendes srl and Florence Pryen [2015] EWHC 836 (Ch) is a High Court, England and Wales, decision of Andrew Hochhauser QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division on 31 March. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On 4 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the case of D v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 157 (QB). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The senior coroner at Molly Russell’s inquest Andrew Walker, has issued safety recommendations that focus on child access to social media content. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
According to the Health Department, it was unknown whether the staff represented the likely source of the outbreak, or whether they “might just be victims”. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Injunctions Blog has a short post on the decision in Ineos Upstream Ltd & Ors v Persons Unknown & Ors [2017] EWHC 2945 (Ch) in which Morgan J continued quia timet injunctions against anti-fracking protestors. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Supreme Court heard arguments this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] BATTLE OF THE SOMME WEEK – PART V: WHAT DID IT ALL MEAN? [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Friday 16 June 2023 there was a pre-trial review the case of Zhurba v Person(s) Unknown before Nicklin J. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 17 May 2023, there was an application in the case of Food Hub Limited v Persons Unknown. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]