Search for: "Anthony Sebok" Results 61 - 80 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
  That someone else is highly respected law professor Anthony Sebok:     Are we really sure that West Virginia Supreme Court Justice Richard Neely was joking when he wrote in his book, The Product Liability Mess, "As long as I am allowed to redistribute wealth from out-of-state companies to in-state plaintiffs, I shall continue to do so"? [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:45 pm
In commentary available online from FindLaw: Anthony J. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:44 pm
Anthony Sebok (Cardozo) has an excellent Findlaw colum (click here) on Exxon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
In Scruggs scandal's Peters-DeLaughter branch, Peters is said to be working with prosecutors [Brumfield, NEMDJ via Folo, more] Class Action Blawg has been rounding up weekly highlights on its subject [latest is the ninth] Anthony Sebok predicts defense win, but... [read post]
18 May 2008, 11:58 pm
Professor Anthony Sebok (Brooklyn) recently posted a brief essay entitled After Philip Morris v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 4:31 am
Professor Anthony Sebok's book review, What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Mass Torts? [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 5:40 pm
Professor Anthony Sebok (Brooklyn, pictured left) has published his book review, What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Mass Torts? [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
We noticed two things in the recent "book review" issue of the Michigan Law Review.First, Anthony Sebok's review of Richard Nagareda's book, Mass Torts in a World of Settlement, is worthwhile for those who toil in the same field that we do, but haven't yet found time to read the whole book.Second, in his review of Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency, Judge Stephen Reinhardt, of the Ninth Circuit, writes this of Judge… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Sebok asked whether McLaughlin "shuts the door for furture consumer class actions" in the Second Circuit. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 10:51 am
Specifically, the Court in Philip Morris more explicitly adopts a one-on-one tort model as the constitutionally favored view of the tort system, at least with respect to punitive damages.Compare Allen's view to that of Anthony Sebok, who draws the opposite conclusion from Williams in his Charleston Law Review article entitled "After Philip Morris v. [read post]