Search for: "Apple Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Frustrated by Apple’s refusal to create the new iOS, the government sought and obtained a court order from U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
Plaintiff, Mia Mason, filed a Class Action Complaint against Defendant, Machine Zone Inc., a mobile video game developer. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm
With Dropbox the case filed Superior Court, San Francisco County, No. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:50 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
Superior Court * Keyword Advertising Doesn’t Create General Jurisdiction–Rocke v. [read post]
Expansion of Class Allows Second Removal Under Class Action Fairness Act, According to Ninth Circuit
21 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
It explained that “Of course, defendants are not entitled to more than one bite at the apple, but the superior court’s certification order substituted a new apple. . . . [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
See I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
To these Supreme Court cases, we append the more recent Superior Court case of Makripodis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Superior Court http://t.co/D2x8epWuxZ -> Assessing piracy harm is like climate science http://t.co/zYFdDfuIcu -> Online infringement hurts: interviews with Australian creators https://t.co/3SdfJqnqVn -> Identity theft insurance: Is it worth it? [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Cf. the old Jake Baker case. * Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
Apple Inc., Judge Ronald S. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:04 am
The case of Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Google post http://t.co/Ds1NgvDuT3 -> Privacy groups raise complaint with ICO over cloud-stored data from hospital records http://t.co/OGl8wxPzft -> MP3Tunes Founder Michael Robertson Found Liable for Copyright Infringement http://t.co/y9YHcGLPWq -> Apple Sued for Over $1.7 Billion in new Copyright Infringement Case http://t.co/AWnTFKEoZI -> Ontario Superior Court Revisit and Broaden Jones v Tsige http://t.co/OqvJ4ydeBP -> Computer and Internet Law… [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:06 pm
BC-536316, was just filed on February 14, 2014, in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
See Apple Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:39 pm
Superior Court (“Platter”). 220 Cal. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:20 am
Belden Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Williams-Sonoma * California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) * Ninth Circuit: FACTA Does not Cover Emailed Receipts — Simonoff v. [read post]
