Search for: "Apple v. Apple" Results 61 - 80 of 6,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2012, 5:04 am
As part of determining this motion, the district court, Judge Posner, requested that Apple answer several questions in camera, including why the inventor retained certain counsel and under what circumstances the inventor retained the additional counsel provided by Apple. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:04 am
In 2010, Apple acquired a corporation called Siri, Inc., which in 2007 "spun off" from SRI International, the company that invented the Siri product now used on Apple's iPhone 4S and other Apple products. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:42 pm by Barry Eagar
As the struggle continues, the Federal Court has overturned the injunction by Apple against Samsung. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
  During closing arguments, counsel for Apple argued that Samsung copied Apple’s designs after realizing that Samsung could no longer compete with Apple. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
  During closing arguments, counsel for Apple argued that Samsung copied Apple’s designs after realizing that Samsung could no longer compete with Apple. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:28 am by Doug Panzer, Esq.
This strategy is currently being played out by tech giants Apple and Motorola Mobility.Apple v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:31 am
In the ongoing battle between Apple and Motorola, Motorola moved to strike portions of Apple's supplemental expert report on damages. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:20 pm by Joe Mullin
Apple's Philip Schiller was one of the witnesses to take the stand today. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Joe Palazzolo
The patent dispute between Apple and Samsung is now thoroughly mainstream. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
The district court rejected Apple's first argument because Apple conceded that the Federal Circuit's en banc opinion in Akamai Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:14 am by Mark Summerfield
  Way back on 2 August 2011, when the Apple and Samsung juggernaut first rolled into Justice Bennett’s courtroom, we predicted that Apple would not be granted an interlocutory injunction (see It’s Apple vs Samsung Down-Under as Smartphone War Escalates). [read post]