Search for: "Application of Her Majesty The Queen"
Results 61 - 80
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
They have three parts: (1) law firms can be invested in (owned—up to 49% or 100%) by non-lawyer people and entities; (2) legal services be enabled to be provided with related non-legal services; and, (3) routine legal services be automated by software applications. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:15 am
R (on the application of Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney General and another is examining whether they can be disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act, following a request from Rob Evans of The Guardian. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
If Rahmatullah and his fellow claimants prevail, they will likely usher in a wave of similar civil suits against Her Majesty’s Government. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
The case does involve Her Majesty the Queen, but only because the plaintiff/applicant legally changed his name to "Her Majesty the Queen. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
The applicant has apparently changed his legal name to Her Majesty (first name) the Queen (last name). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
Her Majesty the Queen Docket 35298 on May 23, 2014, on appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal (2013 ONCA 106). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
It serves as a reminder of the last invasion by a foreign power, and is also a symbol of our constitutional monarchy as her Majesty the Queen still uses it as one of her official residencies. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:07 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
