Search for: "Application of Tate"
Results 61 - 80
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 09/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
Whether the execution of the Court of Appeal’s judgment and order should be stayed pending the resolution of this application for permission to appeal and, if permission is granted, pending the appeal. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
" Second, while the NIFLA Court "refused to recognize professional speech as a new speech category deserving less protection," it also reaffirmed that "[s]tates may regulate professional conduct, even though that conduct incidentally involves speech. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
On Tuesday 15th February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Coughlan) v Minister for the Cabinet Office. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
On Wednesday 2nd February, the UKSC will hand down judgment in R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
In part, Judge Keenan was motivated to reach non-traditional applicants to enter the pipeline to law school. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary… [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:44 am
The DOA goes on to state that: [s]tate employee data was incorrectly shared with RIPTA by an external third party who had responsibility for administering the state’s health plan billing. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary… [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
The Art Owners identify only one exception as applicable: the expropriation exception. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 7 and December 2021 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Sales and Leggatt) heard the appeal in the case of Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, a two-day appeal concerning neighbourhood privacy rights from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
On Tuesday 7th and Wednesday 8th December the court will hear the case of Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm
Firstly, the Judge considered she was bound by Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2020] EWCA Civ 104, in which the Court of Appeal held that the mere overlooking from one property to another was not capable of giving rise to a cause of action in private nuisance. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
" Supreme Court dismissed PEF's application, ruling that the Commission's determinations were rational. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
" Supreme Court dismissed PEF's application, ruling that the Commission's determinations were rational. [read post]
