Search for: "Applied Companies, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States, Defendant-appellee"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp noted that numerous appellate courts, most notably in Dendrite v. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
BANCO NACIONAL DE CRÉDITO, C.A., etc., Appellee. 3rd District.Civil procedure -- Sanctions -- Due process -- State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Alexander, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am
In this split decision, the majority indicates that Plaintiff-Appellant Chubb Custom Insurance Company (Chubb) filed a subrogation suit against Defendants-Appellees for recovery of insurance payments made to its insured, Taube-Koret Campus for Jewish Life (Taube-Koret), for environmental response costs Taube-Koret incurred in cleaning up pollutants released on its property. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Because six of the appellee corporations are Pennsylvania-based, Pennsylvania can certainly be viewed as possessing a legitimate interest in ensuring that Pennsylvania companies do not manufacture or distribute hazardous products which cause injury. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
LOY CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 32 No. 10 Westlaw Journal Automotive 6, Westlaw Journal Automotive November 6, 2012A federal judge in Louisiana has remanded a wrongful-death tire defect case to state court, finding insufficient proof that the plaintiff improperly named an in-state car dealership as a defendant to avoid federal diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Jonathan Joseph is a member of the California State Bar and has focused for over 33 years on regulatory, corporate, securities and transactional matters for banks and bank holding companies and officers and directors of distressed and failed institutions. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
CLEVENS, Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
KALTENBACHER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
T.M.H., Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
In 1991 they entered the United States on visitor visas and, after they overstayed their visas and the Immigration and Nationalization Service issued orders to show cause why they should not be deported, Arturas applied for asylum. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:18 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MITCHEL A. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:27 pm
Intervenor Defendant-Appellant Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), a phosphate mining company engaged in significant operations in Hardee County, Florida, appealed the order by the district court remanding a mining-permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) back to the agency and further enjoining Mosaic from conducting operations approved in that permit. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
Answer: Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
