Search for: "Arnold v. D" Results 61 - 80 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am by Ana Popovich
” Whistleblowers filed separate qui tam lawsuits in federal court in Los Angeles, one by former Prime executive Martin Mansukhani and the other by “Marsha Arnold and Joseph Hill, who were formerly employed in the billing office at Shasta Regional Medical Center, a Prime hospital in Redding, California. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Where there is a chain of landlords, more than one may be liable for an offence (see Rakusen v Jepson (2021) EWCA Civ 1150, per Arnold LJ at (33)). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:04 am by John Elwood
But there is another case that has strong chances of Supreme Court review that I thought I’d flag for you anyway: Golan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm by Alexandre Miura
The starting point of the discussion will be the pending appeal before the UK Supreme Court in Thaler v Comptroller General [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm by Florian Mueller
I'm sure they just couldn't do anything about Judge Kuehnen, who based on how that (mis)judgment reads was just hell-bent to enjoin and may have known SWM's lead counsel too well as a result of certain seminars they co-organized.The Arnold Ruess firm made Quinn Emanuel almost look like fools when Arnold Ruess represented Nokia and Quinn was defending Daimler. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Hyun Woo Kang
Photo Productions was preceded by the earlier decision of Suisse Atlantique Societe d’Armement Maritime SA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:40 pm by Léon Dijkman
Even in the US, where courts have exercised discretion over patent injunctions since the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:12 am by Florian Mueller
[/Update]The two law firms that represented Nokia in the German parts of its recently-settled disputes, Arnold & Ruess (Nokia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Arnold LJ recounted the progression of the proceedings to conclude that this point had only ever been advanced by Motors as part of its honest use defence, which had failed. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
A distinctive feature of Singapore law on issue estoppel is the rejection of the broadly worded “special circumstances” exception to issue in English common law (Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93). [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Arnold is a Senior Director – Legal at the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO). [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
For example, the District of Columbia recently amended its existing entity formation and filing requirements to strengthen required disclosure of direct and indirect beneficial owners of certain entities.These requirements have been outlined in Arnold & Porter's Control and Beneficial Ownership Disclosure Requirements for Domestic and Foreign Entities Doing Business in the District of Columbia Advisory. [read post]